Sources of gamma rays
Natural sources of gamma rays on Earth include gamma decay from naturally occurring radioisotopes such as potassium-40, and also as a secondary radiation from various atmospheric interactions with cosmic ray particles. Some rare terrestrial natural sources that produce gamma rays that are not of a nuclear origin, are lightning strikes and terrestrial gamma-ray flashes,
which produce high energy emissions from natural high-energy voltages.
Gamma rays are produced by a number of astronomical processes in which
very high-energy electrons are produced. Such electrons produce
secondary gamma rays by the mechanisms of bremsstrahlung, inverse Compton scattering and synchrotron radiation.
A large fraction of such astronomical gamma rays are screened by
Earth's atmosphere and must be detected by spacecraft. Notable
artificial sources of gamma rays include fission such as occurs in nuclear reactors, and high energy physics experiments, such as neutral pion decay and nuclear fusion.
General characteristics
The distinction between X-rays and gamma rays has changed in recent decades. Originally, the electromagnetic radiation emitted by X-ray tubes almost invariably had a longer wavelength than the radiation (gamma rays) emitted by radioactive nuclei.[6]
Older literature distinguished between X- and gamma radiation on the
basis of wavelength, with radiation shorter than some arbitrary
wavelength, such as 10−11 m, defined as gamma rays.[7]
However, with artificial sources now able to duplicate any
electromagnetic radiation that originates in the nucleus, as well as far
higher energies, the wavelengths characteristic of radioactive gamma
ray sources vs. other types, now completely overlap. Thus, gamma rays
are now usually distinguished by their origin: X-rays are emitted by definition by electrons outside the nucleus, while gamma rays are emitted by the nucleus.[6][8][9][10]
Exceptions to this convention occur in astronomy, where gamma decay is
seen in the afterglow of certain supernovas, but other high energy
processes known to involve other than radioactive decay are still
classed as sources of gamma radiation.
Naming conventions and overlap in terminology
In the past, the distinction between X-rays
and gamma rays was based on energy, with gamma rays being considered a
higher-energy version of electromagnetic radiation. However, modern
high-energy X-rays produced by linear accelerators for megavoltage treatment in cancer often have higher energy (4 to 25 MeV) than do most classical gamma rays produced by nuclear gamma decay. One of the most common gamma ray emitting isotopes used in diagnostic nuclear medicine, technetium-99m,
produces gamma radiation of the same energy (140 keV) as that produced
by diagnostic X-ray machines, but of significantly lower energy than
therapeutic photons from linear particle accelerators.
In the medical community today, the convention that radiation produced
by nuclear decay is the only type referred to as "gamma" radiation is
still respected.
Because of this broad overlap in energy ranges, in physics the two
types of electromagnetic radiation are now often defined by their
origin: X-rays are emitted by electrons (either in orbitals outside of
the nucleus, or while being accelerated to produce bremsstrahlung-type radiation),[12] while gamma rays are emitted by the nucleus or by means of other particle decays or annihilation events. There is no lower limit to the energy of photons produced by nuclear reactions, and thus ultraviolet or lower energy photons produced by these processes would also be defined as "gamma rays".[13]
The only naming-convention that is still universally respected is the
rule that electromagnetic radiation that is known to be of atomic
nuclear origin is always referred to as "gamma rays," and never
as X-rays. However, in physics and astronomy, the converse convention
(that all gamma rays are considered to be of nuclear origin) is
frequently violated.
In astronomy, higher energy gamma and X-rays are defined by energy,
since the processes which produce them may be uncertain and photon
energy, not origin, determines the required astronomical detectors
needed.[14]
High energy photons occur in nature which are known to be produced by
processes other than nuclear decay but are still referred to as gamma
radiation. An example is "gamma rays" from lightning discharges at 10 to
20 MeV, and known to be produced by the bremsstrahlung mechanism.
Another example is gamma-ray bursts,
now known to be produced from processes too powerful to involve simple
collections of atoms undergoing radioactive decay. This has led to the
realization that many gamma rays produced in astronomical processes
result not from radioactive decay or particle annihilation, but rather
in much the same manner as the production of X-rays. Although gamma rays
in astronomy are discussed below as non-radioactive events, in fact a
few gamma rays are known in astronomy to originate explicitly from gamma
decay of nuclei (as demonstrated by their spectra and emission half
life). A classic example is that of supernova SN 1987A, which emits an "afterglow" of gamma-ray photons from the decay of newly made radioactive nickel-56 and cobalt-56.
Most gamma rays in astronomy, however, arise by other mechanisms.
Astronomical literature tends to write "gamma-ray" with a hyphen,[citation needed]
by analogy to X-rays, rather than in a way analogous to alpha rays and
beta rays. This notation tends to subtly stress the non-nuclear source
of most astronomical "gamma-rays."
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar